Thursday, April 18, 2013

The truth about detox!





For the last few weeks I've been hearing many people talking about doing detox diets or regimes! But do they really work and are they worth the money? Let's take a look at the facts.

The fitness industry is full of myths many of which are perpetuated by the supplement industry. One of the worst is the detox fad or craze! It often attempts to sell you products based on the idea that your body is a toxic cesspool and needs your help to clean it up! The point is, if the marketers leave their claims vague enough, a broader spectrum of people will believe that the product will benifit them. And, of course, the word "toxin" is sufficiently scientific-sounding that it's convincing enough by itself to many people. Most people have no back ground in physiology and have no idea how the body works. Therefore it's pretty easy to fool them into thinking that they need to help the body detoxify. This is simply not true!

Anyone interested in detoxifying their body should just think about paying a little more attention to their body and less attention to the people trying to get their money. Your body already has nature's most effective detoxification system. Millions of year of evolution can't be replaced by a pill, tonic, rub or patch!
The best most effective cleaner we have is the liver. The liver changes the chemical structure of foreign compounds so they can be filtered out of the blood by the kidneys, which then excrete them in the urine. I am left wondering why the alternative practitioners never mention this option to their customers. It's all-natural and proven effective. Isn't it ironic that the only people who will help you manage this all-natural option are the medical doctors? Certainly your naturopath won't.  They wants to sell you some inactive crap that does nothing!


Two American experts said, there was no evidence to support the belief that such regimes help to remove potentially damaging toxins from the body. The lungs, kidneys, liver, gastrointestinal tract and immune system already remove or neutralize toxic substances within hours of consumption.
Roger Clemens, professor of molecular pharmacology and toxicology at the University of Southern California and Dr Peter Pressman, an endocrinologist at private medical firm Geller, Rudnick, Bush and Bamberge, say many have reported detoxing worked for them.

They write: "There are thousands of testimonials that describe experience of less bloating (actually the result of eating less food), clearer skin (improved hydration) and decreased headaches (reduced alcohol and caffeine)." But they say the benefits people feel are not due to their body getting rid of excessive toxins. 
The suggestion that elimination of noxious agents is enhanced because of this regimen is categorically unsubstantiated and runs counter to our understanding about human physiology and biochemistry."  Says Dr. Pressman.

"The improvements detoxers see are instead due to changing from what is likely to have been a "poor" diet.
And they stress the body is designed to "detox" itself."
 


A group of over 300 UK scientists and engineers who investigated the evidence behind claims made for products and diets, have started a public awareness campaign by publishing a dossier that shows the word "detox" has no meaning outside of the clinical treatment of drug addiction and poisoning. Called the "Detox Dossier", the report describes the findings of the investigation by the Voice of Young Science (VoYS) network of over 300 early career researchers. They reviewed about 15 products, ranging from bottled water to face scrub, and found that many detox claims were "meaningless", said a BBC report.

Putting a detox patch on your skin may make the area sweat more, and while very small amounts of chemicals may come out in the sweat, the effect is very small and makes little difference to the overall amount of chemicals in your body, they said. The investigators also said that detox tonics can't improve your liver or kidney function, and if you have too high a dose of some of the detox supplements you could become very ill and even die. They could also interact with other drugs like the contraceptive pill and reduce their effectiveness.
According to Dr Daniel McCartney of the Irish Nutrition and Dietetics Institute." At a fundamental level the damage that is caused to human body tissue by the wear and tear of day-to-day living is caused by chemicals called free radicals, and there are three main sources of these."


‘‘First, they are produced by every living cell in the body – in other words, every cell that uses oxygen produces free radicals as a by-product, in much the same way a car produces exhaust fumes as it burns petrol,” he says.

‘‘The second source is in our immune system. When our white blood cells deal with pathogens in the body, such as bacteria, viruses or fungi, they use these damaging free radicals to do the job for them. But when those cells of the immune system be come over-active, and there is an uncoordinated or overactive inflammatory response, the body produces too many free radicals. The excess spills out into the surrounding tissue, and this is what makes your throat feel sore when you have an infection. It’s not necessarily the streptococcus, but the immune response to it.”

The third and final source of free radicals, according to McCartney, is the environment around us and our personal habits. Key factors in the over-production of free radicals in the body are things like inhaling cigarette smoke, not getting enough exercise, gaining weight around the middle of the body and heavy alcohol consumption.


‘‘There are proven things you can do to make yourself healthier, but there’s no quick-fix solution. Going on a so-called ‘detox diet’ after a period of over indulgence doesn’t offset the damage you’ve done. It can actually cause more harm, and in fact some kinds of damage to your liver, brain and gut can never be undone. The best advice from a dietician’s point of view is to have a habitually healthy balanced diet where you’re not over indulging in things like alcohol,” he says.



  

CLAIMS MADE ABOUT DETOXING

Claim 1: Toxins build up in the body and need to be flushed/cleansed from it.

The terms ‘toxic’ or ‘toxins’ are used to imply that a chemical is causing you harm. The truth is, all chemicals can be toxic and it is the dose that is important – for example, one 400mg vitamin A tablet may be beneficial, but taking 20 at once could damage your liver.

Most chemicals do not accumulate in the body: they are removed by the liver and kidneys. Many detox products which claim to flush the body of chemicals contain diuretics, which increase the amount you urinate. This just removes water and some salt and could cause potential other health issues! In extreme cases, diuretics can cause your salt levels to become depleted, causing cramping or, in the worst cases, a coma. You may achieve temporary weight loss by dehydration, as with a sauna, but this is only short term, as you will regain weight while you rehydrate.

Claim 2:  ‘Eliminatory organs’ should be detoxified.
The term ‘Eliminatory organs’ as used by detox products refers to the liver, kidney and digestive system. These organs don’t need to be cleansed unless you have consumed a dangerous dose of a substance to the extent that they are overwhelmed, such as a drug overdose. In these cases, medical intervention is needed via stomach-pumping, blood transfusion or dialysis.

Claim 3: The product will help ‘neutralize nasty free-radicals’
Detox tonics and supplements often claim to contain high level of antioxidants to help remove free radicals in your body. Free radicals are made in the body and can cause cell and DNA damage, but they also play an important role in our immune system, protecting against bacteria and viruses. The body makes its own antioxidants, using the food in our normal diet. Additional antioxidants are removed by the kidneys and excreted in the urine as waste. 




Just like weight loss and fitness there is no magic pill you can take! So if you want to become healthier and take better care of your body. It's that simple eat well drink plenty of water and exercise! There is no easy way to get fit it takes work!
PJM

 

 

 


 





Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Peter and Mike on the CTV morning show discuss adaptive fitness and why many people need to have a modified exercise program!
TopShape Fitness is one of the worlds leaders in Adaptive Fitness!

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Aerobics and Weight Loss: Why Running Sucks for Weight Loss!




  One of the first questions we are asked by clients looking to lose weight is; where are the treadmills, stationary bicycles and ellipticals? The other, equally common question is about the type of aerobic classes offered and how often they are and how many can I sign up for?
As a gym owner, and personal trainer I am unfortunately very much aware of the importance of aerobics in the scheme of getting people to sign up for training and programs, but the irony remains that aerobic exercise is vastly overrated as a means of getting into shape in terms of losing weight and keeping it off.
The facts are that currently 80% of people are using aerobics as a tool for trying to lose significant amounts of body fat. This is primarily driven by advertising and misinformation, unfortunately not results. In this article 

I want to highlight the common misconceptions that masquerade as good training practices and show the overall superiority of resistance exercise over aerobics in terms of reducing overall body fat.
Both men and women everywhere will look to the well-defined midsections of so many fitness magazine cover models and with absolute certainty, I can say that if taking a spin class and doing cardio was the way to attain it, that almost everyone in your neighbourhood gym would look just like the models you see on TV, and they don't.

  It can be extremely frustrating, having read the books, and put in the time attending class after class, and riding, stepping or jogging the life out of yourself and still not have 'the look.' Sadly the fault does not lie in you, the individual, but rather in a lack of credible information from authorities that are not simply vested in selling you something. The definition of insane is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result! So, as I said in the last article about over training more is NOT better!
Scientific studies abound in the media about the wonders of aerobics for fat loss, and the ever present argument about its heart healthy benefits. Many of these claims are being refuted by more credible experts in the exercise field. But it still somehow does not stop thousands people from being frustrated over their failure to transform their bodies after working so hard to do so.  
Firstly, let us define the term aerobic. Since it is often misunderstood to begin with the word aerobic means; ‘with oxygen’ and it refers to a specific metabolic pathway within the body that yields energy through the oxidation of fats and carbohydrates.

  When most people think of aerobic activity they think of long duration, low intensity exercises that elevate the heart rate, e.g., jogging, spinning classes, stair climbing, rowing etc. (Note however that these actions of the heart and lungs are completely dependent on muscular activity). The theory is that by performing  aerobic activity your body will burn fat as an energy source, increase your resting metabolic rate (metabolic rate being the amount of  calories that your body uses), and thus burn off unwanted extra calories. It is also believed that aerobic exercise will create an increase in endurance and provide a protective benefit from heart disease. This all sounds great in theory but the reality outside of the lab is quite different.
While I will agree that there are some benefits to the cardiovascular system from these exercises, the fact remains that numerous studies prove conclusively that you can achieve a significant cardiovascular effect through the some high intensity weight training and sometimes to a greater extent!

  Aerobic exercise does not burn a large amount of calories, sadly this is nothing but a myth, and though it may stand as accepted fact for most in the field it does nothing to change the physiologic reality that refutes it. 
Here is an example:
A 180 lb man supposedly burns 850 calories during an hour of an all-out high intensity aerobic class, and that same individual would barely burn 900 calories after running at a 9 minute mile pace for an hour without stopping! (A female of a lesser body-weight would burn even less calories.)
So these might sound like a lot of calories but consider that to lose one pound of fat you need to burn a total of 3,500 calories! In fact one pound of fat can hold enough energy for over 10 hours of continuous activity! 

  Our fat storage system is a biological fail safe that we as human beings have acquired as a means of allowing us to survive periods of drought, famine and overall lack of food for the first several hundred thousand years of our existence. Taking this evolutionary reality into consideration, it makes sense that our bodies would not shed its fat stores easily from something as much of our early ancestors' everyday life as running or walking. If this were the case and losing fat was that easy, we would never have survived as a species.

  The idea of increasing your metabolic rate from aerobic is simply ridiculous. If aerobic exercises do not burn a significant amount of calories while you are doing them, do you really think that they would make you burn a significant amount when you stopped doing them? Study after study have been done to show that aerobics do not have a significant long term effect of increasing metabolism; in fact some researchers found that such regular exercise actually lowered metabolic rates in some participants! That’s right, it lowered your metabolism! Mostly due again to high levels of stress hormones and the low intensity of the exercise itself!
In other studies it was shown that endurance athletes report having to eat LESS to maintain their ideal weight as their training duration increases. It seems that their metabolic rate slows to conserve calories as a defense mechanism, similar to the way metabolism slows in those with a low food supply as a defense against starvation. Slower metabolism means that you are much less likely to lose body fat. Exactly the opposite of what you want to do.

  An interesting study conducted at the University of New South Wales, Australia found that after 15 weeks of high intensity workouts three times a week, women in the high intensity group lost an average of 5 ½ pounds of body fat. This figure correlated with an 11.2 % decrease in their overall body fat levels. The other group that did three conventional steady state cardiovascular workouts (ran 10-12km) per week for the same period of time actually saw an increase in their overall body fat levels!

  Consider also the physiques of endurance athletes such as marathon runners. The marathon runner may look skinny, but does not exactly have the taut and toned muscular physique that you would expect. Actually they’re a bit on the flabby side, and this makes sense biologically for an endurance athlete. If you regularly perform a long term repetitive activity that requires fat as a fuel source, your body will make fat storage a priority, and will also shed any excess muscle not directly involved in the activity.
The end result is that most endurance athletes will have lower muscle mass, and higher body fat due to the nature of their exercise. Exactly the opposite of what people trying to get into shape are looking to achieve

  Not only are most so called aerobic activities inefficient with regards to fat loss, they can also be very dangerous. I have had so many clients over the years with severe injuries to their knees, hips, hamstrings, ankles and backs from running, stair climbing and aerobics classes. Even seemingly benign activities like stationery cycling can generate a great deal of wear and tear on your joints. Over a period of time you can seriously injure yourself from what are termed overuse injuries. You may feel fine now, but the damage is cumulative, building up over the years until it finally impairs your mobility.  Arthritis, tendonitis, tendonosis and bursitis are much more prevalent in endurance athletes than in their weight training counterparts!
So I don’t want to say that you shouldn’t run, bike, row, and do spinning classes. They have their uses and can be fun to break up the monotony of weight training, but if your goal is to lose fat and look chiseled then they should not be the focus of your training program! Remember also that nutrition plays a key role in physique augmentation!  Don’t neglect your body and feed it right!
PJM

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Work hard but rest hard Chronic overtraining and the immune system





Most people into health and fitness usually conform to two trains of thought.
  1. 1.     They under train and never really see results and then usually don’t adhere to a program for more than three months at a time. (weekend warrior)
  2. Then we have the hard core trainers, the “go big or go home” kind of guys!    They’re who this article pertains to the most! Although the 1-3 times a week exerciser is not totally immune to the effects of over-training!
  Many of us train 5-6 hours plus per week and are called athletic and are the most susceptible to immune system dysfunction due to high levels of stress. Remember, stress is stress; the body does not distinguish between the different types.  It only adds to the overall level of negative reactions to it.
I often tell my clients “there is a very fine line between enough exercise and too much!” There is a growing amount of research indicating that over-training is becoming a significant problem in those that think more is better!

  According to a recent Ball State University study on endurance training, athletes proved that rest and recovery is critical to optimal performance in training and competition.  Those at higher risk of over-training are endurance athletes or athletes that combine endurance training and strength training.  These individuals are usually multi-facet athletes.  Sprinters, swimmers, cyclists and fitness professionals who have livelihood commitments attached to their training.
This topic was thoroughly explored at the world's largest fitness convention; IDEA (International Dance and Exercise Association) in San Francisco, CA.  IDEA is a founding organization for fitness professionals and represents over 19,000 members, 60 countries worldwide.
  
In the last few years, IDEA as well as other governing bodies for fitness professionals has recognized the need for awareness of exercise and its relationship to over training and illness. This awareness is in pursuit of educating the public on the proper use of training as a tool for health benefits, and as a word of caution for athletes as well.
The lecture at the conference provided mounting evidence that supports the deterioration of physical, chemical and cell barriers when athletes or avid exercisers become over trained. These negative effects are on the antibodies found in the bone marrow, which are a direct threat to our ability to sustain long-term wellness. Also affected are cytotoxins, which mediate bacterial and viral defense. The damage of these antibodies has a direct effect on our ability to kick a viral or bacterial infection, and even avoid illness such as cancer!
  
  Those at high risk of over training and becoming subject to possible cell damage can be endurance training athletes or those who take part in heavy cardiovascular training. There is a short window of opportunity when the immune response is low. This is the time when antibody production is decreased because the body is under physical stress and as a result, acute or chronic infections can occur.
The window of opportunity is 1 to 4 hours post endurance training. At this time, white blood cells have decreased and do not come back up above normal until 8 to 12 hours post training. Illnesses that occur during this window of opportunity are most often upper and lower respiratory tract and viral infections. These infections can be either acute or chronic (long term or reoccurring).
  
  Over trained athletes or avid exercisers commonly suffer from above the neck infections such as a common cold or respiratory tract infection that linger. It is critical for athletes and avid exercisers to understand the signs of over training and the benefits of rest during illness or post training recovery.
Signs of over training are all too familiar to well-trained athletes, however, most of the time these signs are ignored. In addition, these athletes are often under the direct supervision of professionals that write their training schedules, which protects the athlete.
These include:
  • ·        Lack of motivation that lingers for days.
  • ·        You feel especially sore following a big workout.
  • ·        You stop seeing results.
  • ·        You become restless and lose focus.
  • ·        You feel sluggish all day, extreme fatigue.
  • ·        Chronic soreness in your joints, bones and limbs.
  • ·        You’re sick more often and colds and flu etc. tend to linger.
  Most individuals that take part in rigorous exercise are unable to recognize these signs and therefore are unable to monitor their own warning signs. These signs also include an increase in resting heart rate. One may also notice their training heart rate zone will be reached much sooner into a training period unless altitude is a factor.
Researchers based in Japan have recently looked at the effects of repeated rugby matches on immune function, to help them evaluate the cumulative effects of consecutive bouts of high intensity exercise (‘Effects of rugby sevens matches on human neutrophil-related non-specific immunity’, British Journal of Sports Medicine2007; 41:13-18). Rugby is arguably one of the most intense contact sports, requiring a high level of physical preparation. Rugby sevens is played on a normal- sized pitch and as the name implies, each team consists of seven players. It is not unreasonable therefore to conclude that these players have a potentially higher exercise loading than their counterparts who compete in normal rugby matches.

  The research team monitored members of the Japanese sevens squad during the course of one day, when they had to play two competitive matches with just four hours’ break in between each match. Blood samples were taken immediately before and after each match: blood lactate measurements clearly showed that the matches were intense enough to induce muscle damage and fatigue. Further blood analysis showed that the counts of neutrophils (the immune system’s white blood cells that do a lot of micro-damage clearance) had a tendency to decrease after the first match, and increased significantly four to six hours later.

  This is good news: the neutrophils were doing their job, increasing in number, running around the body engulfing micro-organisms and preventing infection. The problems started after the second match. The researchers found no significant changes in neutrophil counts, suggesting that the repetition of intense exercise had reduced the neutrophil inflammatory reaction, and that recovery from physical damage was compromised for as long as 24 hrs!
Ongoing research has suggested that high-intensity training (exceeding 90% VO Max, or near exhaustion) is generally followed by an immune system crash. Lasting anywhere from 3 to 72 hours depending on the person in question, many experts believe that there are several factors that contribute to this period of vulnerability.

  Dr. Mark Jenkins, associate team physician for Rice University states that more than one component of the immune system may be weakened by excessive training -- for example, by more than 90 minutes of intense exercise. These include changes in the number and function of immune system cells, such as white blood cells, antibodies, and pro- and anti-inflammatory bio-chemicals such as cytokines.
During the 3 to 72 hours following an overly intense workout, there may be an "open window" during which "viruses and bacteria may gain a foothold, increasing the risk of subclinical and clinical infection. Thus, risk of upper respiratory tract infections can increase when athletes push beyond normal limits," according to Jenkins. Also, training while sick is just as bad as the immune system response to the training (reparation) is decreased due to its need to fight of the infection!
  
 Here's the bottom line. If you're looking for an edge, you're going to have to face the fact that, at some point, your training will eventually graduate to a level that can take a serious toll on the body. More is not always better and listening to your body and how you feel is as important as the actual exercise program itself!
Train hard but rest hard as well. Eat well, sleep well and if you’re stressed out at work or at home etc; it might be a good idea to decrease the intensity, volume and or the amount of sessions of your training until things get better!
PJM.
Topshape.ca